Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Allan McRae <allan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Attila wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> i recognized that there is new package in aur for opera with this >>> informations: >>> >>> "This package is the official one from the [extra] repository. We have to >>> move >>> it because of a unclear license issue. After we have clarify this issue >>> the >>> package will be back in the repos or not. It should not be moved to >>> community, because of the license." >>> >>> I'm a little bit surprised that a custom license is such a problem because >>> this shows me 343 entries: >>> >>> find /var/abs -name PKGBUILD | \ >>> xargs grep license | \ >>> grep custom | grep extra | wc -l >>> >>> Will now all packages with custom licenses disappear from extra? >>> >>> >> No. Only the ones where it is unclear if we can legally distribute it. >> > > To clarify a little more, a "custom" license is not a specific type of > license. It just means the package ships a license that is > non-standard and doesn't have a name. The license that is shipped with > Opera has some odd language, making us unable to ship it at this > current time. > > Then also this opera package should be moved from community to AUR http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9028 ? -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ( djgera ) http://www.djgera.com.ar KeyID: 0x1B8C330D Key fingerprint = 0CAA D5D4 CD85 4434 A219 76ED 39AB 221B 1B8C 330D
