Alright. Perhaps if we're in agreement on this point, it should be removed from the wiki that this can "cause problems". Honestly, I'm not sure what these problems could be, I was just going as per advice. Regardless, nice to keep my DAEMONS list a bit shorter. Cheers, -AT On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jan de Groot <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 21:37 +0200, Bram Schoenmakers wrote: >> On Thursday 23 April 2009 20:31:45 Andrei Thorp wrote: >> >> > "When HAL initializes it will check >> > for the presence of D-Bus and load it automatically. If you have dbus >> > in your list of daemons, remove it, since it can cause problems." >> > >> > -AT >> >> Just out of curiosity, does anyone know what problems could arise? >> >> Kind regards, > > > There is no problem putting dbus in the DAEMONS array, as long as it's > started before hal it's fine. This "start dbus" logic was added to hal > because users didn't put dbus in rc.conf and reported bugs about "hal > not working". Hal won't start dbus when it's already running. > >
