xf86-video-intel-legacy vs xf86-video-intel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: xf86-video-intel-legacy vs xf86-video-intel
From: Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 18:53:02 +0200
Delivered-to: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Is it possible to make these packages not conflict each other?
So that one could have both installed and alternate when needed?

-- 
damjan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xf86-video-intel-legacy vs xf86-video-intel
  - From: Jan de Groot

Prev by Date: Re: Bug reports for out of date packages?
Next by Date: Re: xf86-video-intel-legacy vs xf86-video-intel
Previous by thread: eject: unable to eject, last error: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Next by thread: Re: xf86-video-intel-legacy vs xf86-video-intel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux