Re: PKGBUILD: mkdir or install?
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: General Discusson about Arch Linux <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: PKGBUILD: mkdir or install?
From
: solsTiCe d'Hiver <
solstice.dhiver@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:46:36 +0200
Delivered-to
:
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <1239024565.10994.12.camel@jan>
Reply-to
: General Discusson about Arch Linux <
arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
if i am correct, makepkg reset umask to a sane default like 0022
References
:
PKGBUILD: mkdir or install?
From:
Ali H. Caliskan
Re: PKGBUILD: mkdir or install?
From:
Jan de Groot
Prev by Date:
Re: PKGBUILD: mkdir or install?
Next by Date:
Re: Surviving without X
Previous by thread:
Re: PKGBUILD: mkdir or install?
Next by thread:
[signoff] kernel-2.6.29.1-2
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Wireless]
[Linux Kernel]
[ATH6KL]
[Linux Bluetooth]
[Linux Netdev]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Share Photos]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Device Mapper]