Re: On rolling release system and its benefits.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ali H. Caliskan wrote:
Hi,

I've been using Arch since few months and I enjoy using it everyday that
goes by. However, during that time, while helping Arch users on the forum,
I've encountered some issues concerning upgrades and broken packages. I
personally think Arch is stable and well maintained compared to other big
distros, but that's a rolling release stability, that lasts only few days or
weeks. What I would like Arch developers is to extend the rolling release
into a snapshot release of an entire list of officially maintained packages,
comprising both core and extra branches. At least it would be a great way of
using Arch for 5 to 6 moths and then upgrade to a next snapshot release. I'm
not talking about stable releases, just a snapshot of a rolling state.
Snapshot releases does also benefit the natural need of closing bugs. Not to
mention, it does make it easy to maintain orphaned packages as well.

Not going to happen... well at least not by the official dev team. And every community based proect to make a stable Arch branch has failed (although the last one got much closer than any previous attempts).

Allan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux