On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Baho Utot <baho-utot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: >> >>> >>> Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I totally second that. It is really frustrating as a bug reporting user >>>> to >>>> end the discussion like this. >>>> It really looks like a "shut-up and stop annoying us" thing... >>>> >>>> I know it did not gave me the motivation to open other bugs. >>>> >>>> I don't see why the discussion should be closed when the bug is. As >>>> Damjan >>>> said, some useful information can still be provided even if the bug is >>>> closed. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2009/2/16 Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Which is why I don't submit bug reports anymore. >>> >> >> Instead of +1'ing this could you provide examples instead? >> > > No not really, as I am done with this and I am not going to argue with > anyone about this. > > It's just that I came looking for help and got slammed one too many times. > > Now I either go the the news groups for help or fix it my self. If I don't > get a solution then I skip the package and move on. Out of curiosity - how many people here also believe that the bug tracker is for help? I am honestly interested, as this could be the source of confusion here - the above is actually the way things SHOULD work - forums, newsgroups, mailing lists, etc should be used for help; the bug tracker should be used for bugs or "actionable items"
