cdrecord instead of wodim

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: cdrecord instead of wodim
From: Avramucz Péter <muczyjoe@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:29:10 +0100
Delivered-to: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi!

What would you say to a wodim -> cdrecord transition? I have a bug
here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/13181 .
And Joerg Schilling wrote me, that cdrecord is still developed. So,
what do you say?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
  - From: Grigorios Bouzakis
- Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
  - From: Pierre Schmitz
- Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
  - From: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
- Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
  - From: Xavier
- Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
  - From: RedShift

Prev by Date: Re: HTML email will be rejected
Next by Date: Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
Previous by thread: HTML email will be rejected
Next by thread: Re: cdrecord instead of wodim
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux