On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Damjan Georgievski <gdamjan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is it possible to have an imagemagick package without it depending on > xt and libx11? Although some imagemagick applicatives need X (the "display" obviously is one example of that), others doesn't. One example is the "convert", it converts a picture to another format (jpg to png or gif to eps). I have a friend that uses this applicative to convert files on his website, which runs in a server without X. > > > > -- > damjan > -- Rodrigo L. M. Flores Computer Science Student - IME - USP Homepage (en): http://www.rodrigoflores.org Blog (pt-BR): http://blog.rodrigoflores.org Linux User # : 351304 Jabber: im@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
