Re: [arch-dev-public] Maintainer wanted for ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ondřej Kučera wrote:
Hi,

Kessia 'even' Pinheiro wrote:
True, but, it depends of the user. If he don't use any gem, it wont
broke. So, we need decide if we'll provide a new package with many new
features, or wait some time (how much?) to provide this package
because some (how much?) users use a specific gem to code/run a Rails
app.

Yes, it's not an easy question, ideally someone enough involved in the Rails community should say when it is OK (from Rails point of view) to upgrade Ruby. I'm definitely not that person I'm afraid, I just wanted to say that upgrading Ruby has its consequences. I myself don't use/need any other gems than those that Rails require, at least for now I don't.

We can alway have a ruby package and a ruby18 package at a later date, much like what will happen when I make python3 to python. Currently, it seems that nothing in the repos builds against ruby-1.9 so I (or whoever takes ruby over) can wait for that transition and provide a ruby19 package.

Allan




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux