Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
From: "Daenyth Blank" <daenyth+arch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:49:30 -0500
Delivered-to: arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <494515C3.3020901@nemesis13.de>
Reply-to: General Discusson about Arch Linux <arch-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 09:18, Hubert Grzeskowiak
<arch-general-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> i like the idea. what would be the disadvantages, Daenyth?
I just think it's very ugly "solution". IMO, the current behavior is
fine. Keep it elegant.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
  - From: Aaron Griffin

References:
- Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
  - From: Grigorios Bouzakis
- Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
  - From: Pierre Chapuis
- Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
  - From: Hubert Grzeskowiak

Prev by Date: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
Next by Date: Re: Dovecot imap processes pinning CPU
Previous by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
Next by thread: Re: [arch-dev-public] [signoff] pacman 3.2.1-2, pacman-mirrorlist
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Wireless] [Linux Kernel] [ATH6KL] [Linux Bluetooth] [Linux Netdev] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux