It is ok, but why replacing?
I spend ~4h per week to maintain all my packages. It is not problem to
add high voted packages to community.
To summarize the TU meetings (logs have been posted...), it is about
replacing very low usage/unused packages in [community] with those
with higher usage in unsupported. I.e. optimizing our resource usage.
People with opinions on this should be discussing this in the
dedicated thread(s) on aur-general so the discussion is easier to
follow. This thread is too much of a direct attack on one individual
to be productive. Go through all the packages with low vote on AUR
and low usage from pkgstats and you will find that Sergej has around
as many packages as would be expected given how many he maintains.
Has anyone manually checked what proportion of his low vote packages
are not dependencies for other packages? This need to be dealt with
on a whole group basis, not an individual basis.
