On Monday 10 November 2008 23:12:49 Hubert Grzeskowiak wrote: > a pacman which sends informations home - unasked?! are you serious? that > would be a data privacy horror! i don't want to have to observe pacman's > traffic the whole time fearing leaks. a feature/bug like that would > rather raise a huge scandal than appreciation. i have no doubt on this. Of course i dont want this to happen neither. Im just saying it would be the best population of result, 'statistically speaking'. As of pkgstat, yes it is heavily discussed, but i never installed it before i started reading this thread. Regards, Charly
