However Loui *is* suggesting coercing/forcing TUs to do things based on the voting system. It is part of another concurrent thread called "Packages in Community and votes" that he started.
Very best regards;
Bob Finch
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Firmicus <Firmicus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
w9ya a écrit :Bob, I think it makes more sense to discuss this on the aur-general list, or, even better, at our forthcoming "TU Meeting". No decision has been made yet. And nobody has suggested coercing TUs to do this or that on the basis of votes. But we think there are important matters to discuss concerning the community repo. This is why Allan has suggested we meet on IRC before the end of this month.
And what you have done below is called taking/quoting something out of context to change it's meaning.
i.e. The important things to remember is that the TU's make up the rules AND that the voting system was put in place after assurances that it would NEVER be used to make decisions for ANY TU. (i.e. At ANY time in the future.)
Sorry but that is the history hereabouts.
Best regards;
Bob Finch
Best,
François
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Xavier <shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:20 PM, w9ya <w9ya@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:w9ya@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Um,,, ehem;
>
> I would like to remind everyone that the TU system was NOT
originated solely
> to be based on votes, in fact there was no voting until much
more recently.
>
This is called evolution
( 1. A gradual process in which something changes into a different
and usually more complex or better form. )
