On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Xavier <shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:20 PM, w9ya <w9ya@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Um,,, ehem; >> >> I would like to remind everyone that the TU system was NOT originated solely >> to be based on votes, in fact there was no voting until much more recently. >> > > This is called evolution > ( 1. A gradual process in which something changes into a different > and usually more complex or better form. ) > First off all, let discuss this subject in peace, so Xavier please don't be arrogant ok?. IMHO the vote system can't be the "unique" indicator to move a package to community, for example, many packages (see from the first to the seven most voted on unsupported) won't be in community, for many reasons, even if those are high used/voted. Plus, exists many packages which won't have many votes and SHOULD be in community or official repos (those all i18n packages, aspell, etc), then the vote system can't be the unique indicator so there isn't an evolution at all.. I think the _problem_ of community is those all TUs who forgot using AUR then move everything directly to community.. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909 Arch Linux Trusted User
