On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Xavier <shiningxc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And just for clarification, this looks like a very special bug which > appears only under some special circumstances. That is why it is very > difficult to reproduce. And that is why I had to ask everyone if they > can check whether it is reproducible on their system. > > In other words, it will go fine for most people. We are only > interested by the few cases where it does not go fine :) > Ok, I think you can forget about this problem, it is likely just an user (developer?) mistake which was already made before : http://archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2008-March/011491.html That is, don't use the -d flag which skips all the dependency checking, otherwise you are asking for troubles.
