On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 09:38:42AM -0400, Dale Blount wrote: > > > +1 on the change from /home, but I don't think /usr/share is the right > > > place. /usr should be able to be mounted read-only except when software > > > is changed. That's something you can't do if you keep websites > > > there. /var/www or /srv/www are much better choices. > > > > You got me wrong. :-) /usr/share is used only for the datadir. According to > > configure this is for "read-only architecture-independent data". And those > > things should stay in /usr/share. There is no pre-configured documentroot > > where you have to put your webpages. That's up to the user who has to adjust > > httpd.conf to his needs. Nobody should put his web content > > under /usr/share. :-) But there will be an install message about this. > > /usr/share will host the error directory. I for one have several hosts > with custom error files, although I suppose a rw remount to change those > isn't the end of the world. I think the idea behind /usr/share is that you copy the data to where you actually want to host it. If you have custom error pages you wouldn't even bother with /usr/share and just put copies of those pages where you're hosting (/srv/www for example).
