* Attila <attila@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On Sonntag, 4. Mai 2008 22:28 Tino Reichardt wrote: > > > It isn't to hard. Its just the plain truth. > > > > If the maintainer hasn't the time, he should give the package to someone > > else, which has the time. > > Okay, if you reduce this only to "maintaining" than it could be true but i > suggest to think this to the end and this means for me that every distro > without a company in the backhand can't ensure fulltime maintaining. > > Sorry to say, but if you want a guarantee than you have to buy it. But perhaps > i can't recognize the problem because i don't think that clamav is so a > important package for archlinux. > > For me there be more ways than only to asking for an package update. Another > option could be to make this update, runs it and send the maintainer an email I asked that: "Should I build a new package ?" > about the result. At this point it ends for the user and the devs itselfs > have to look if there is a problem with maintaining or not. > > > PS: I am not an admin of some important server which needs an update ;) > > Everybody of us here has root acount and so at the end we all be admins.-) Admin of an important server != admin of some private notebook ;) -- regards, TR
Attachment:
pgp_nKpO6lHl9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
