On Monday 07 April 2008 17:45:29 Thomas Bächler wrote: > I quote: > "'Simple' is defined from a technical standpoint, not a usability > standpoint. It is better to be technically elegant with a higher > learning curve, than to be easy to use, and technically crap." > > What you don't get is that if you have to make a decision between two > equally technically elegant decisions, and one of them improves > usability, you go for usability. You twisted it. Mind the "not" in front of "a usability standpoint". It says: technical correctness > usability not: usability > higher learning curve But you know that argument failed, which is why you argue it beeing invalid: > I will say it one last time: Adding the _necesity_ to configure > something that doesn't need to be configured is crap, from a technical > and a usability point of view and thus defeats the Arch Way. thanks again for admiting that you disrespect the arch way. Now black on white and not revokeable. -- best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen Arvid Ephraim Picciani
