Thomas,
On Mar 31 13:18, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> It seems to be working perfectly, so I am considering dropping ipw3945 from
> core/support with the 2.6.25 release (so there will be no new package
> versions after ipw3945-1.2.2-8). This is intended as a warning, but also as
> a question: Is there anyone who cannot use iwl3945 instead of ipw3945?
Instead of removing ipw3945 entirely, could you place the
last version (1.2.2-8) in extra or community?
Also, once you do (re)move the package will you add a
replaces=('ipw3945') to the iwlwifi PKGBUILD?
Sincerely,
--
Antony Jepson / <antonyat@xxxxxxxxx> / GPG Key: 0xFA10ED80
Attachment:
pgpkGsnCKekmO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
