On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 14:53 -0400, Loui wrote: > > > Loui <louipc.ist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > GPL2 "or, at your opinion, any later version" is not the same as > GPL2 > > > > only + GPL3 or later. ;) > > > > > > > > > > Can you explain why they are not the same? I don't quite > > > understand why that doesn't work. Thanks. > > > > > > http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv3-incompatible_licenses > > Your link doesn't do anything to explain why (GPL2 or later, GPL3) > is practically any different than (GPL2, GPL3) > > Am I missing anything? Please let me know. I think, what Roman states (and what is right as far as I know), is that (GPL2+) != (GPL2, GPL3+). That's all I guess.
