On 26/02/2008, waldek <waldek.news@xxxxxx> wrote: > Aaron Griffin wrote: > > > Yes. We are aware. The simple fact is that there are lots of things to > > change, and all of us are busy. Considering that it is VERY low > > priority, no one has got to it. > > > > You are more than welcome to submit a patch that does this if you > > think it can be done faster. > > > maybe you do it already, but just in case you don't, if you don't have time > for tasks a "monkey" could do, maybe you could advertise it somewhere and I > am sure there would be people willing to help. > Since you're the Boss - delegate ;-) I think one of the issues with licensing is not the actual "doing it" but the fact that it would entail a new release of the package and they don't want to force everyone to download the packages just for a minor change in the PKGBUILD. The idea is that whenever a new version of a package is released, the license field should be updated as well. Slowly with rolling release, we'll end up with all packages having licenses. Dusty
