On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 17:13 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote: > On Feb 8, 2008 5:06 PM, marc[î1] <marci1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Arch devs put man pages in /usr/share/man like FHS want, ok. > > > > But FHS says : > > « Manual pages for X11R6 are stored in /usr/X11R6/man. It follows that all > > manual page hierarchies in the system must have the same structure > > as /usr/share/man. » > > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMANUALPAGES > > > > I don't understand FHS or ArchLinux should put X11 man page > > in /usr/X11R6/man ? > > Hmmm, I actually think you might be right here. It seems weird, but > the FHS is fairly explicit on it. I'd suggest you file a bug report > about this. > > As for Travis' comment, xorg 7 is an implementation of X11R6. No, not the crappy /usr/X11R6 prefix again. FHS or not, the manpages don't belong in a directory where the rest isn't installed. Even Debian, the most FHS-compliant distro I know, isn't installing X11 packages in /usr/X11R6 anymore.