Re: What should be done with octave?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Neil Darlow wrote:
Hi,

Arch has octave-2.1.73 in extra.

The current stable version of octave is 3.0.0 but it is not backwards
compatible with the 2.1.x series.

The gcc-4.2.3 migration has broken octave due to a versioned dependency
on gcc-fortran. Also, the PKGBUILD has no license or md5sum entries.

The octave-2.1.73 PKGBUILD will need fixing but should it be updated to
3.0.0 and, if so, should a legacy octave2 package be created?

I'm looking for opinions before I file any bug report.


By the way, there are two PKGBUILDs of octave 3 in AUR : octave-devel and octave3.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux