On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:36:55PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > On Feb 6, 2008 5:32 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:25PM -0500, Travis Willard wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2008 5:10 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <grbzks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:26:09PM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I've cleaned up testing a bit: > > > > > - moved xulrunner/seamonkey/firefox and friends to extra. This is part > > > > > of the /usr move > > > > > > > > Any idea why an /opt/mozilla/lib directory is still created by one of > > > > those packages? It doesnt seem to be part of any of these filelists. > > > > I wanted to ask this when the packages were still in testing but totally > > > > forgot to. > > > > > > Is it just the empty dir - ie no files inside? It may be inefficient, > > > but pacman -Ql | grep /opt/mozilla/lib will see if any packages create > > > it (since I don't think you can do -Qo on a dir) > > > > > > > It was just the directory otherwise it would be easy to find out with > > -Qo. Its been like 10 days i have removed the directory and the path > > may be a bit deifferent, not sure 100%. And by the way it was a fresh > > install on my reborn 2nd Archlinux installation. I have firefox & > > flashplugin only installed so its probably one of them creating it later > > for some reason when run. > > People updating now, and not only, should be able to verify this. > > > > Greg > > Looks like the mozilla-common package. It still keeps the legacy dirs > around just in case some old packages need it. > Ah, right. thanks for pointing this out.
