söndag 16 december 2007 skrev Mister Dobalina: > The point is that the developers don't want to get a > bunch of bug reports for things that might be > i586-specific problems. They are saying "we've tested > the package that is built using this PKGBUILD on i686 > and/or x86_64, and if you have a problem with it let > us know, but if you use this PKGBUILD to build for > some other architecture, you're on your own". <<<cut>>> > Well, that's exactly what it means now. But the devs > don't want to go to the work of doing that on i586, > because arch is an i686/x86_64-optimized distribution, > and has never claimed to be "tried and working" on > i586. Is that the opinion of all the developers? If it is so, I have to consider forking off my own distribution based on archlinux. It simplifies some things, since I can deviate and don't have to care for policies and so on. But forks can create extra trouble in the future, and it always splits up human resources. Anyway, I already have archi586 running, and currently I am mostly spending time with bugs in archlinux, and not so much with the i586 implementation. Karolina
