I agree with Karolina. Karolina I would like to encourage you to put a repository up for VIA C3, I was interested in lowarch http://www.lowarch.org/ and I tested it, but it seems dead/dormant. I would like to have an archlinux version installable on a C3 so If you need help (cpu power for compiling, testing, help with scripting, etc) ask me and I'll see what I can do for you. Massimiliano On 12/15/07, Karolina Lindqvist <karolina.lindqvist@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > lördag 15 december 2007 skrev Dan McGee: > > > The arch= tag indicates that we, as the Arch Linux developers, have > > successfully built a certain package on the given architecture. Since > > we do not build for i586, we cannot make this claim and so do not add > > this architecture to the arch= line. > > That is allright, but why abort "makepkg" on non-authorized architectures? > Better to give a warning that this build is unauthorized, unsupported, or > whatever, instead of aborting. To insert the i586 tag, to make the package > build, just defeats the purpose as you describe it. Sharing that package > might make others believe that it it is authorized by the archlinux > developers. > > Karolina > > >
