On Dec 4, 2007 12:41 AM, Michael Towers <gradgrind@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > but your responses here suggest that there wouldn't be > much point ... That's not entirely true. My responses here are based more on the fact that what you see as a problem, I see as something you _should_ solve for yourself. I know it makes me difficult and all, but I see this sort of stuff a lot - one user wants a change so _we_ must change for them. Yada yada, it's tedious. In this case, I feel like you have a problem with one package, and see the guidelines at fault, but you could simply rebuild the package to fit your own personal guidelines. > (And where would the correct place for that be anyway? It's not a > package, so maybe not Flyspray? The discussion page? Does anyone read > that? ...) Flyspray says nothing about packages in the default category. It is named "Arch Linux" because it is general to the distro. That Project has sub-categories which include "Packages: Extra", "System", "Installation" and more
