Hi folks,This is a really, really minor enhancement, but we have REMOTE_ADDR and REMOTE_PORT, would it make sense to have REMOTE_PROTOCOL_FAMILY [Ie. either "IPv4"/"IPv6", or "2"/"10"] to disambiguate the REMOTE_ADDR format ?
The IP protocol family can be reverse-engineered by checking the format OTOH, so this is not a really major issue, but for consistency it might make sense.
Or would it introduce some low-level protocol detail which has nothing to do here ? (after all, the REMOTE_ADDR string can be parsed by the system, whatever the format is)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx