On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Mohit Anchlia <mohitanchlia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jeroen Geilman <jeroen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11/15/2010 10:21 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Jeroen Geilman<jeroen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On 11/15/2010 10:12 PM, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Jonas Eckerman<jonas_lists@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2010-11-04 23:38, Mohit Anchlia wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 500 (Internal Server Error) Can't read entity body: Connection reset >>>>>>> by >>>>>>> peer >>>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain >>>>>>> Client-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 22:36:21 GMT >>>>>>> Client-Warning: Internal response >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If this is in something done with perl LWP, the "Client-Warning: >>>>>> Internal response" header indicates that the error is generated by the >>>>>> perl or XS HTTP code and not by the server. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <http://search.cpan.org/~gaas/libwww-perl-5.837/lib/LWP/UserAgent.pm#REQUEST_METHODS> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> But even access logs don't show http 403: >>>>> >>>>> 10.4.106.55 - - [04/Nov/2010:15:39:36 -0700] "POST /val/validate.cgi >>>>> HTTP/1.1" 400 364 "-" "libwww-perl/5.79" "eitws1" 0 - - - 188 522 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> No, it says 400 - bad request. >>>> Check the logs of your CGI for what went wrong. >>>> >>> >>> Nothing is wrong in the request. If I just remove LimitRequestBody and >>> send the same request it works. >>> >> >> I am not claiming it is a bad request. Apache tells you it is. > > I don't believe right thing the return code is correctly returned when > I use LimitRequestBody. I can't seem to explain why I would get http > 400 for all the good requests that are over certain size but it works > when I remove or increase the limit. >> Since LimitRequestBody is not working as I expect it to. I am wondering if there is anyway I can write my own handler that looks at content-length and descides to either pass it through to mod-jk worker or reject it with customized error message. Is it possible to do that? >> -- >> J. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. >> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|