Hi Rainer, we discovered the same Tomcat-"connection-switch" problem again. This time with the Apache2 ERROR-LOG, containing: Apache2-ERROR-Log Output: [Mon Oct 25 10:18:58 2010] [error] server is within MinSpareThreads of MaxClients, consider raising the MaxClients setting [Mon Oct 25 11:46:35 2010] [error] server reached MaxClients setting, consider raising the MaxClients setting [Mon Oct 25 11:50:02 2010] [error] (70007)The timeout specified has expired: ajp_ilink_receive() can't receive header Apache2-ACCESS-Log Output: 10.35.32.123 - - [25/Oct/2010:11:50:04 +0200] "POST /servlet/ClientIO/1ojgw1th835ue/s6/y1 HTTP/1.1" 500 1258 "-" "Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.1" "JSESSIONID=A62BCC2B1054CA532C68CA409F41548C.rb-wcmstc1" "A62BCC2B1054CA532C68CA409F41548C.rb-wcmstc1" "JSESSIONID=56DB518EDE4EFED6337349F3478A4863.rb-wcmstc2; Path=/" 2795 When checking the configuration file for the MPM ("httpd-mpm.conf"), the central Apache2-configuration does not include that file: # Server-pool management (MPM specific) #Include conf/extra/httpd-mpm.conf Currently, we use the "worker"-MPM as shown in the "apachectl"-output (AND NOT WORKER): <hostname>:/opt/wcms/apache/bin $ ./apachectl -M | grep -i "worker" Syntax OK mpm_worker_module (static) When monitoring the Apache2 via the "/server-status" resource, the following information is shown (see screenshot enclosed): As you can see: - the total amount of requests possibly being handled in parallel: 400 - the amount of idle workers sometimes reaches the critical value: 0 (not documented in the screenshot enclosed) Our questions: - why 400? We assumed a default value of 150 for "MaxClients" (see "httpd-mpm.conf") - should we increase the "MaxClients"-value by explicitly defining it in "httpd-mpm.conf" (as mentioned in the "error.log" above)? When monitoring one of the Tomcats below "/manager/status" (here: "rb-wcmstc2"), the screenshot enclosed shows the following information: - MaxThreads: 500 - ThreadCount: 252 - Current Thread Busy: 239 The configuration for the Tomcats (here "rb-wcmstc2"): <!-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --> <Connector port="8009" protocol="AJP/1.3" redirectPort="8443" allowTrace="true" maxThreads="500" /> Consequence: - it seems to be clear, that Apache2 is the bottleneck (the amount of connections available within the "connection-pool" does sporadically reach the value of "0") What are your suggestions? Kind regards, Holger King -----Original Message----- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Freitag, 15. Oktober 2010 15:26 To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: "proxy_balancer" | stickysession On 15.10.2010 12:32, King Holger (CI/AFP2) wrote: > it's a pity - but the clocks are in sync (using NTP). On both Tomcats and the Apache2 instances. Good to know. > According to the following command output: > grep -i "52C326B80A73EFF19CEE49B013533F06" localhost_access_log.2010-10-14.log > > the last pattern match for the JSessionID mentioned below is: > 10.35.32.123 - - [14/Oct/2010:11:45:01 +0200] POST /servlet/ClientIO/90i8dcztq97l/s6/21i HTTP/1.1 200 197 52C326B80A73EFF19CEE49B013533F06.rb-wcmstc2 > > So, I cannot find any further request logged further down in Tomcat "rb-wcmstc2". So we deduce, that either the request is still hanging inside Tomcat or it never reached Tomcat. Although the latter is more likely, you can check: if you have the Tomcat manager webapp deployed, you can look at the status page, which shows a list of all in-flight requests. > Due to an already overwritten error.log (log-rotation), I do not have any more access to the Apache2 error-log. :( Then there's likely no way forward for this incident. We would nee dto wait for the next one :( > We will add the "%D" to the log format string on both Apache2 and Tomcat. Good, it's helpful in a lot of situations anyhows. > Any more hints to identify the problem? The problematik POST request seems to be: >> 10.35.32.123 - - [14/Oct/2010:11:45:03 +0200] "POST /servlet/ClientIO/90i8dcztq97l/s6/21j HTTP/1.1" 500 1258 >> "-" "Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.1" "JSESSIONID=52C326B80A73EFF19CEE49B013533F06.rb-wcmstc2" >> "52C326B80A73EFF19CEE49B013533F06.rb-wcmstc2" "JSESSIONID=B3C4AABB5F983A0E9D6478C42C88A5C4.rb-wcmstc1; Path=/" > > This POST throws a 500 status code. Sorry, to many possible reasons in the proxy for that. You need the error log. You can try to make your setup a bit more robust by looking at the parameter table given at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypass For the ajp workers, the following parameters come to mind: - ping (e.g. ping=10s) - connectiontimeout (e.g. connectiontimeout=10s) - timeout (e.g. timeout=120s) - keepalive=On The 10 second timeouts could also be lowered to e.g. 5 or 2 seconds if you are reasonably sure that you don't have any longer GC pauses on the Java back-ends. A good value for the general timeout depends on your expectation of response times the back-end will be able to support as long as it is running well. The "%D" in the access log will help you get some real numbers. Regards, Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
tomcat6_status.jpg
Description: tomcat6_status.jpg
Attachment:
apache2_status.jpg
Description: apache2_status.jpg
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx