Re : [users@httpd] proxy_loadbalancer and failover

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the quick reply.

I don't think so. As I said, I did see in the code I have that we can match the status code against a list of error codes and place the worker into error state if it matches. This PR looks to be exactly that. I tried it but the stable release I downloaded refused to start saying it didn't like the config directive. The real problem I have is that there isn't any status code at all because it never connected. The 502 is created by the proxy and not the origin server.

How is failover supposed to work with the balancer?

Michael


De : Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx>
À : users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Envoyé le : Jeu 19 août 2010, 15h 21min 58s
Objet : Re: proxy_loadbalancer and failover

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:56 AM, michael bienstein <mbienstein@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>. But if I configure it to go to a port that is not
> listened to, then I get a 502 every second request and the balancer worker
> is never put into error state.

related to this enhancement / PR?

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=930125&view=rev

--
Eric Covener
covener@xxxxxxxxx

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "  from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux