RE: NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple SSL virtual hosts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Look this link dear,

http://www.zdnetasia.com/configure-apache-to-support-multiple-ssl-sites-on-a-single-ip-address-62059501.htm

In web hosting environment, one certificate used for single domain and other sites are using by /sitename etc.. but if we use Apache 2.2.12 version we can install multiple Certificates for multiple Domains.

Regards,
Manoj

> Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 13:29:26 -0400
> CC:
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple SSL virtual hosts
>
> Manoj,
>
> I am using 2.2.11. Hmmmmm.
>
> Are you saying if I move to 2.2.12 I can server multiple name-based ssl virtual hosts on the same IP and ports?
>
> Even so, I may choose to use a multi-domain SSL certificate. Being able to use this for up to 25 domains seems like a lower cost alternative to buying 25 separate certificates.. Have you had any experience with this? If so, do you know how to configure the virtual hosts for this? I am guessing one just points the SSL directives in each VirutalHost to the same server key and certificate. But please, advise if you know for certain how this works.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Manoj Samtani" [manoj.kumar84@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Date: 06/06/2010 10:20 AM
> To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple SSL
> virtual hosts
>
> Which Apache version are you using?
>
> Till now Multiple SSL VHOST's are not available for same port and IP. This can be possible through Apache 2.2.12.
> So, you do not need to take tension ;-)
>
>
> Just change your Apache Version.
>
>
> Regards,
> Manoj
>
> > Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:12:09 -0400
> > From: covener@xxxxxxxxx
> > To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: NameVirtualHost Directive - - - - Multiple SSL virtual hosts
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Jeff Shearer <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > [Sat Jun 05 15:51:21 2010] [warn] VirtualHost fqdn1.com:80 overlaps with VirtualHost fqdn2.com:80, the first has precedence, perhaps you need a NameVirtualHost directive
> > >
> > > This is repeated for every name-based virtual host I have until I added the fqdns to /etc/hosts. However, I still get the error message about NameVirtualHost 192.168.0.93 has no Virtual Hosts
> > >
> >
> > The arguments for your 1 NameVirtualHost and correspoinding N
> > VirtualHosts have to be identical in the literal sense, not just
> > logically the same.
> > --
> > Eric Covener
> > covener@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
> Manage your finance and manage money through MSN Money Special Drag n' drop
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
> See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>


The dark side of terrorists revealed in MSN Internal Security Get it now.

[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux