Re: mod_rewrite Redirection ignoring the explicite code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Your 301 rule is wrong. As i said it should match the URI parth meaning the part after the slash following the domain name and not the whole URL. So no http:// in the rewrite rule hope this makes it more clear.

Sent from my phone

On May 7, 2010 8:48 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann" <guenther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:28 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote: > Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the...

Argh! An RTFM response. I probably deserve it. But...

I did read the docs. Lots of 'em. Still, I don't see why it behaves as
it does, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered you in the first place.

Also, which of the rules is wrong exactly? Or rather, why is it ok to
ignore the explicit redirect code? Sorry, I really don't see how I
should correct the rules. Any more detailed pointers?

> Sent from my phone

Yeah, it's not urgent, I'm fine waiting until you're back to a decently
sized keyboard... ;)

 guenther

> > On May 7, 2010 7:44 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann" <guenther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Please ...

> > Extract the leading part of the REQUEST_URI. Look it up in our legacy > > map, and if and only i...

--

char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t+...


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux