Your 301 rule is wrong. As i said it should match the URI parth meaning the part after the slash following the domain name and not the whole URL. So no http:// in the rewrite rule hope this makes it more clear.
Sent from my phone
On May 7, 2010 8:48 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann" <guenther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 08:28 +1000, Igor Cicimov wrote: > Your RewriteRule is wrong it works with the...
Argh! An RTFM response. I probably deserve it. But...
I did read the docs. Lots of 'em. Still, I don't see why it behaves as
it does, otherwise I wouldn't have bothered you in the first place.
Also, which of the rules is wrong exactly? Or rather, why is it ok to
ignore the explicit redirect code? Sorry, I really don't see how I
should correct the rules. Any more detailed pointers?
> Sent from my phone
Yeah, it's not urgent, I'm fine waiting until you're back to a decently
sized keyboard... ;)
guenther
> > On May 7, 2010 7:44 AM, "Karsten Bräckelmann" <guenther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Please ...
> > Extract the leading part of the REQUEST_URI. Look it up in our legacy > > map, and if and only i...
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t+...