Re: Apache vs LiteSpeed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Jarrod Slick <jarrod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Apache Users,

As some of you may or may not know a fairly prominent commercial webserver, LiteSpeed, claims to outperform even a well configured Apache 2.2.x installation by orders of magnitude.  They have some internal benchmarks that appear to back this up, but, being a natural skeptic, I wanted to test it out for myself.  So I've agreed to pit Apache and LiteSpeed (as well as a few other webservers) against one another in benchmarking tests on a 2x Xeon 5520 machine.  I, and hopefully others, will be configuring Apache.  LiteSpeed will be configuring their product.

What is the workload you are benchmarking?  Static pages, PHP/mod_perl code, CGI, etc.?  Is the client a benchmark tool or a browser, and where on the network is it relative to the server?  How are you measuring performance (page load times, requests/second, etc.)?

-----Scott.


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux