Firstly, sorry for the top post …
according to Apache.org :- “'-F' (is existing file, via
subrequest) (http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_rewrite.html) This warning is related to the “F”
flag and not “f” as Tom mentioned; surely if there was a
performance issue with “f”, it would be documented as it is for “F”. I would say that performance-wise, Tom’s
suggestion would be the best (compared to my random hack suggestion anyway!). Richard. From:
Andrew Hole [mailto:andremailinglist@xxxxxxxxx] Your solutions looks very
useful, but i'm afraid about impact on server performance. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>
wrote: On Wed, 2009-08-26 at
12:23 +0100, Andrew Hole wrote: This looks like a simple rewrite rule surely?
********************************************************************** Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance to it. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of Minorplanet Systems plc shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. Minorplanet Systems plc, Registration no: 3372097
Minorplanet Limited, Registration no: 4072786 Greenwich House, 223 North Street, Leeds, LS7 2AA VAT #: 698 1438 86 ********************************************************************** |