There's some confusion here as to just what is problematic. A link-local address works just fine without a scope-id. So those suggesting a modification of the address need to ask, not "do you need to use a link-local address," but, "do you need to specify a scope-id?" Because the address parsing objected to the scope-id, not to the interface address. I've been pondering this a bit, and I can't think of a reason why HTTPD would need to deal with scope-id. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@xxxxxxxxx Friends don't let friends publish revisable-form documents.
Attachment:
pgpQCwWYx4U7e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|