> -----Original Message----- > From: André Warnier [mailto:aw@xxxxxxxxxx] > > Would that not prevent browser-level caching of the javascript ? > If yes, that would probably more than cancel any advantage of the > "minification", no ? I don't know for certain the OP's motivation but it may not be just to save bandwidth... There is a security imperative for cleaning up JS - comments, and even variable names, can reveal details about your server's implementation that may assist an attacker. You can (should?) go the whole hog and obfuscate the code too (re-write variables to "a", "b", "c" etc, remove white-space, etc..) Rgds, Owen Boyle Disclaimer: Any disclaimer attached to this message may be ignored. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP > Server Project. > See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender urgently and then immediately delete the message and any copies of it from your system. Please also immediately destroy any hardcopies of the message. The sender's company reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through their networks. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|