REllis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Unfortunately no. You see FoxPro is an odd beast. It'll allow you to run a script/program without the extension. So from within FoxPro you can type "do c:\temp\appname" and it'll look for appname.prg, then appname.app. So the developers who wrote these apps are requesting pages like /cgi/login?foo=bar causing FoxPro to look for the login.prg or login.app. So if I use a rewrite rule like that it'll break if the code is a .prg instead of an .app and unfortunately they used both all over the place. Ideally I would make the developers rework their apps but unfortunately we've let the developers go and are maintaining the apps with the understanding that they won't be modified.Shot from the hip : wouldn't "content negociation" help in a case like that ? I'm thinking vaguely of the mechanism that is normally used to return a .html.en or .html.es or .html.fr etc...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|