> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:34 AM, Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Bizarre conclusion. Other interpreters are likely more > > thread-aware/thread-exploitative when not embedded in Apache, so > > they'd be less likely to casually link with non-threadsafe libraries. On 12.02.09 23:02, howard chen wrote: > Why? Since if mod_php has thread safety problem with Apache2 worker > MPM, mod_python/mod_ruby should also have these problem, isn't? Only if they use the same non-thread-safe libraries. such codes can have internal ways for avoiding such problems but I doubt any does, it's pita to code such thing. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. "Two words: Windows survives." - Craig Mundie, Microsoft senior strategist "So does syphillis. Good thing we have penicillin." - Matthew Alton --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|