Re: Possible to use pseudo-name based SSL-connections with many SSL hosts in the background?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Carsten Aulbert <carsten.aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx> [2009-01-18 18:35]:
> Krist van Besien schrieb:
> > The problem is that you are trying to work around a problem in the
> > protocol. It is not a limitation of apache that you can't use
> > namebased virtualhosts with ssl, it's a limitation in the protocol,
> > and you will encounter this limitation regardless of what you choose
> > to use to receive the SSL connection.
> 
> Yes, that's right, so it seems the RFC extension openssl0.9.9(?) and
> gnutls implement are the suggested "workarounds" to use?

  openssl 0.9.8j configured with enable-tlsext
+ patched mod_ssl https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34607
= no mod_gnutls necessary

cheers,
-peter

-- 
peter.schober@xxxxxxxxxxxx - vienna university computer center
Universitaetsstrasse 7, A-1010 Wien, Austria/Europe
Tel. +43-1-4277-14155, Fax. +43-1-4277-9140

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
   "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux