At 08:23 -0800 1/4/09, Evan Platt wrote:
At 08:20 AM 1/4/2009, you wrote:how did this get mixed in by Threadr with the Tomcat discussion?My guess is the person who wanted to unsubscribe picked a message, replied to it, then changed the subject to unsubscribe.
Right you are. These headers were in the first Unsubscribe message. Message-ID: <C5837D95.29E09%berickson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> In-Reply-To: <495E1E49.3090804@xxxxxxxxxx> A quick search for the message-id in the Reply-to header comes up with; Message-ID: <495E1E49.3090804@xxxxxxxxxx>In-Reply-To: <1BCA52CF5845E543B4B81AAFEF2AFD7905F243F0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Isolating slow and fast connections using apache/modjk
Not all mail clients handle the In-Reply-To: header the same way and hardly any allow that chain to be exclusively used to keep threads associated with each other. It's a shame because of the Re: [users. .] AW: spelling corrections, and a bunch of other things that get "helpfully" added to Subject: lines.
But it's good netiquette to start a new thread with a fresh "new message". RFC-2822 is the place to start
-- --> A fair tax is one that you pay but I don't <-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|