Re: Implementing SSL with name based vhost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Covener wrote:
Those aren't name-based yet.  If you had two on the same port, they'd
have to share a single certificate and all their SSL settings.  So you
could say it's vacuously possible.


I'm doing name based vhosts with SSL by using a wildcard certificate for *.example.com. All my vhosts are subdomains of example.com, so it works for me. The ssl cert is sent before the browser requests a particular server name, but since my cert is valid for all of the server names, it works. Speaking of which, it's reminded me I wanted to post about mod_proxy balancer-manager not displaying these ssl named based vhosts. I imagine it's not expecting this config, and isn't parsing it properly. Any assistance from those folks is appreciated.

Ryan

begin:vcard
fn:Ryan Fox
n:Fox;Ryan
org:The University of Findlay;Information Technology Services
adr:128 Old Main;;1000 Main St;Findlay;OH;45840;USA
email;internet:rfox@xxxxxxxxxxx
title:Network Systems Manager
tel;work:419-434-4348
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux