Re: Implementing SSL with name based vhost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Eric,
 
Sorry i did not get it..
You said "Those aren't name-based yet"..
what would make them name based?
 
 
My aim is to use name based ssl vhosts listening on  multiple ports.
(we are not able to use IP based hosts since siteminder does not have capability to ignore hosts with IPaddress)
 
-Vijay

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Eric Covener <covener@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Vijay <vjpoluri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are trying to implement SSL & SSO (siteminder) on our Apache2.0.55.
> We have some restrictions with IP based vhosts, so we are trying to use name
> based vhosts (with SSL)
>
> Is it possible to have multiple name based vhosts listening on different
> ports for SSL something like:
> Each ssl.conf file will look like:
>
> <VirtualHost *:567>
>      ServerName abc.corp.com
>
> <VirtualHost *:568>
> ServerName xyz.corp.com
>
> <VirtualHost *:569>
> ServerName test.corp.com

Those aren't name-based yet.  If you had two on the same port, they'd
have to share a single certificate and all their SSL settings.  So you
could say it's vacuously possible.

--
Eric Covener
covener@xxxxxxxxx

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux