> On 9/10/08, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 09.09.08 21:23, solprovider@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > 5000 reqs/sec @ 20 KB/req = 100 MB/sec = 1Gbaud. One gigabit network1 > > > > please don't mess bauds and bits per second. it's something very different. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baud On 10.09.08 11:36, solprovider@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Thanks. Back in the modem days, baud was (correctly) shorthand for > bps. Wikipedia states that is no longer valid. it was right only for 300baud/bps modems, all other had higher bit than bayud rate ;) > > it's even 800, not 1000 Mbits per second... > > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > > Rough conversion (from the old days) was: > 1 byte of data > = 8 bits on disk > = 10 bits of network traffic this was also correct in modem times. I don't think that network (http/tcp/ip) headers cause that big overhead now :) Yes, it depends on size of average requests... However we should count that into average size of request... > = 13 bits of encrypted (SSL) network traffic Interesting, I guess that mostly applies to SSL handshake overhead. I don't have the numbers but I guess encrypted text should not be much bigger than non-encrypted. Does somebody have the data? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. On the other hand, you have different fingers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|