Re: Apache benchmark in reverse proxy scenario for large Web apps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Kew a écrit :
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:20:34 +0200
"Sylvain Beaux" <sylvain.beaux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi gays,

Who???
so I calculate Max Client = 1300 Mb / (6,084 - 3660) = 540 processes,
I prefered gaving some memory margin in case of ...

Do you agree with this result ?

Sounds like a case where Prefork is a poor choice of MPM.  I'd expect
to see much better performance figures from Worker or Event.

I expect you could usefully reduce the number of modules loaded, too.

For this test I disabled every modules which are not require. I've tested every modules independently. But for the MPM I've no choice because I use a perl module that require the fastmap library which does not work with a threaded MPM.
Do I need a better harware ?? or is my configuration not optimal ?

Apart from a more appropriate MPM, google for ApacheCon presentations
from Colm MacCarthaigh and Brian Akins, both of whom have run Apache
with very much higher loads than yours.

	 (I used this doc :

That's mod_perl.  Your needs are different to a mod_perl user!

I use a perl module for cookies support and this module need the import of mod_perl.

--
Sylvain Beaux


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  "   from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


[Index of Archives]     [Open SSH Users]     [Linux ACPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Squid]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux