Krist van Besien schrieb:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 13:41, Jan <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi! I have just noticed yesterday that one of my mod_rewrite rules which works fine in Apache 2.0 doesn't seem to work in Apache 2.2. Here is the rule: RewriteRule ^portfolio/([0-9]+)(/)?$ portfolio.php?serie=$1 So a request to portfolio/ID is supposed to be send to portfolio.php?serie=ID. This works fine on the Apache 2.0 installation but on the Apache 2.2 server the ID is somehow not passed to the script. However, when I change the rule to: RewriteRule ^folio/([0-9]+)(/)?$ portfolio.php?serie=$1 and call the page with folio/ID it is passed to the script. Alternatively it also works when I rename the file to something != rewrite rule, instead of changing the redirect. Is this supposed to be this way? Again, it works in Apache 2.0 as expected, but not in Apache 2.2. Any comments on this issue will are greatly appreciated.This is quite odd, and should not happen. There might be something else in your config interfering. Have you turned on RewriteLog with a sufficiently high loglevel? The rewrite log should tell you what matches are tried.
Hi,just another wild speculation: As it does work with "folio" but not with "portfolio" (which happens to be the name of the PHP file): Could it be that you have mod_speling turned on in your Apache 2.2 installation and had it turned off in Apache 2.0? I suppose that mod_speling "corrects" the unavailable "portfolio" to the only alternative, portfolio.php, BEFORE any RewriteRule matches, and thus does not pass the ID.
Sascha --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|