On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Scott Gifford <sgifford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Brown Chris-CCB034" <Christopher.Brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I'm looking at a situation where we'd want to close a connection (for example > > the message size is too large) but we'd like to keep the thread active so that > > we can perform some other steps before releasing the thread. Is this possible? > > I've been looking through the apache header files and nothing stands out to > > me as a method that would immediately close the connection without releasing > > the thread. > > In the process model, you just fork() twice and continue your work in > the grandchild process. Not sure with the threaded model, but > probably you could just create another thread to do your work, and set > it up to not require joining. > > ----Scott. You can do your followup processing in the logger hook, but you'll have to stash away any data you need between hooks. -- Eric Covener covener@xxxxxxxxx --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|