On 2008Feb13 13:18 , "Nick Kew" <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:08:53 -0500 > "Todd, David" <dtodd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> My question is about the Location directive, and the ordering of >> them, with respect to Require directives and authorization. > > I've no idea what your question was. But if it got no answer, > there's a strong chance it didn't make sense in the first place. Okay, let me restate it: If you have nested Locations: /foo/* and /foo/bar/*, and you need to have different htgroups controlling them, what configuration allows you to have the group permissions for /foo/bar/* override those for /foo/*? In other words, I want general access for /foo/*, except for certain directories which must have tighter access controls. My experience has been that of the ordering is to define the Location for /foo/*, then the Location for /foo/bar/*, then no access is given to /foo/bar/* at all. If the two are reversed, then it's as if the /foo/bar/* directive isn't there. --------------------------------------------------------------------- The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx " from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|