Thanks.
I will sendthese email feedbacks to the person who
mentioned it to me and make sure I heard it right.
Many Thanks!
-Tony
--- Sander Temme <sctemme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
>
> > I have heard a strange story about how using 1
> port
> > for Apache SSL is not a good idea for performance.
> I
>
> Sounds like something for Mythbusters!
>
> > heard if you have three sites usign the same SSL
> port
> > it could really slow down performance as compared
> to
> > putting those sites on separate ports for SSL.
> >
> > Should not each site have it's own port for SSL?
>
>
> For all practical purposes, each SSL site will have
> its own IP
> address. This has much the same effect as running
> the sites on
> different ports: each virtual host will have its own
> listener.
>
> S.
>
> --
> Sander Temme
> sctemme@xxxxxxxxxx
> PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40
> 1529 24AF
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|