On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 12:46:23AM -0700, lists wrote: > Mark H. Wood wrote: > > Your chance to tell me where to go :-) > > > > I'm looking for a good place to discuss non-server-specific issues > > relating to spidering. Such as: "I have this great new proposal that > > would help us to segregate spider and real-user access in our > > statistics...." > > > > do you mean something like this? > [AWstats robot report] Well, I have a patched version of DSpace (a document archive web application) that shows the download count for each individual document on the document's detail page, and download totals for each community and collection. I want to make those as accurate as possible, where "accurate" means "not including spider accesses". So yes, I want to do something like AWstats is doing to segregate access statistics, but AWstats is not the answer. And I'd like to discuss, somewhere, ways to make it easier to identify *new* spiders *before* they pollute my stat.s. -- Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mwood@xxxxxxxxx Typically when a software vendor says that a product is "intuitive" he means the exact opposite.
Attachment:
pgpPRrInCoOSn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|